Deception-aware Pragmatic Inference

نویسنده

  • Katerina Papantoniou
چکیده

Pragmatic competence i.e., the ability to understand intended meaning is a long standing challenge in communication. This work proposes a computational framework for pragmatic inference that is based on reasoning by taking into account the realistic assumption that any communication could be deceptive and that intentions can be reflected in language use. Pragmatic inference is examined under the light of culture since as literature manifests, cultural differences is a crucial parameter in the communication process and often a cause of misinterpretations (e.g., false alarms about the deceptiveness of a message). In contrast to the current situation, the proposed approach takes a holistic stance, aiming to infer knowledge both from surface patterns in raw text and more formal structures beyond the text level.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Individual Determinants of Media Choice for Deception

Recent research has found that deceivers are extremely difficult to detect in computer-mediated work settings. However, it is unclear which individuals are likely to use computer systems for deception in these settings. This study looked at how 172 upper-level business students’ political skill, social skill, and tendency to use impression management was related to their deception media choice ...

متن کامل

"Everyone Has to Do It: " A joint action approach to managing social inattention

In an always-connected world, managing social inattention – that is, explaining the inability to interact at a particular time – can be as important as coordinating mutual availability. Inattention, particularly if repeated, can have significant relational consequences as it may be considered rude and can lead to painful social outcomes. Prior research has examined the butler lie, one strategy ...

متن کامل

Considering the case for an antidepressant drug trial involving temporary deception: a qualitative enquiry of potential participants

BACKGROUND Systematic reviews of randomised placebo controlled trials of antidepressant medication show small and decreasing differences between pharmacological and placebo arms. In part this finding may relate to methodological problems with conventional trial designs, including their assumption of additivity between drug and placebo trial arms. Balanced placebo designs, which include elements...

متن کامل

Belief ascription in mixed initiative dialogue

Real dialogues often feature conflicting beliefs and goals between the participants. In such cases, it is often necessary for one participant to reason about the nature of the conflict and respond appropriately. This paper presents a brief outline of a computational theory of dialogue understanding which can deal with such conflicts. Our theory is capable of distinguishing between cases of prag...

متن کامل

Self-Deception and Agential Authority. A Constitutivist Account

This paper takes a constitutivist approach to self-deception, and argues that this phenomenon should be evaluated under several dimensions of rationality. The constitutivist approach has the merit of explaining the selective nature of self-deception as well as its being subject to moral sanction. Self-deception is a pragmatic strategy for maintaining the stability of the self, hence continuous ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017